今天给各位分享thefountainhead电影的知识，其中也会对thefounder电影进行解释，如果能碰巧解决你现在面临的问题，别忘了关注本站，现在开始吧！
《阿特拉斯耸耸肩上下》epub下载在线阅读，求百度网盘云资源
《阿特拉斯耸耸肩（上下）》（安·兰德）电子书网盘下载免费在线阅读
资源链接：
链接：
密码：lbj6
书名：阿特拉斯耸耸肩（上下）
作者：安·兰德
译者：杨格
豆瓣评分：8.6
出版社：重庆出版社
出版年份：2007-10
页数：1069
内容简介：
1957年，《阿特拉斯耸耸肩》首次由兰登书屋出版。据说，这部小说当时已被12家出版社退稿，出版以后，恶评如潮但畅销无比，对美国大众的影响仅次于《圣经》，作者也因该书几乎激怒了整个成人世界：父亲、母亲派闭、左派知识分子、自由主义者和保守主义者。他们贬低她：“只有十几岁的青少年醉心于她的学说。”咒骂她：“她患上癌症完全是她在哲学上和精神上犯错的结果。”在政治上，兰德是一个失败者，自由主义者不喜欢她摆出的自我为中心的姿态；保守派不喜欢她的无神论；蔽埋双方同时都反对她的个人主义。
然而，与青年马克思一样，兰德也是“不怕闪电、不怕霹雳、不怕天空中的惊雷”——或许，安·兰德是美国文学史上最具争议的作家之一，她提倡自私的美德，公开为资本家辩护，而且毫不掩饰她对庞大政府的憎恶。《阿特拉斯耸耸肩》在美国的销售已达千万，被称为“自私圣经”——在书中，与《资本论》对资本的批判一样，她对空想社会主义进行了批驳：在20世纪发动机公司，实行了各尽所能、按需分配的制度，开始人们都欢欣鼓舞，觉得这样就可以人尽其才物尽其用，结果能干的人工作越来越多，懒惰的人的需求越来越多，工厂很快就倒闭了。看来，在对人性的缺点没有充分的了解时，在财富还没有达到无限充裕的时候，空想社会主义的乌托邦显然会给社会带来灾难。
在《阿特拉斯耸耸肩》中，兰德试图解决这个矛盾，在她看来，财富是人类思想力的结晶，妨碍竞争、扼杀创意、执意维护既得垄断利益的资本家是可耻的；而通过自己的创造性劳动赚取的金钱则值得尊重。
作为一部乌托邦小说，《阿特拉斯耸耸肩》描绘了一个由自私而精明的商人、科学家、艺术家等社会精英组成的世外桃源，有着田园诗般的诗意和现实社会中的欲望的满足。在这里，维系着一切的不是道德而是金钱，金钱被视作为崇拜的偶像，是自由交换和公平正义的象征，每个人都是独立的创造者和思考者。小说结尾，由于强者罢工、抛弃了弱者，世界陷入了无边的黑暗，而乌托邦里则是一片和谐幸福。同时，兰德借书中主人公约翰·高尔特之口来说明了她的客观主义哲学：
财富观——财富是人类生活的一种工具，是人类思想力的结晶。当你判断某人德性的时候，请听他对金钱的理解：诅咒金钱的人通过不正当的手段获取金钱，尊敬金钱的人则依自己的本事赚取金钱。金钱是社会美德的气压计，远离告诉你钱是万恶之源的人。
历史观——文明就是一个逐步将个人解放出来的过程。人天生便会思考，让那些叫嚣说人的思想自由在创建工业文明后便毫无用处的吃人者从大学的经济系主任的位置上退下来，让他们拿起弓箭，穿起兽皮。每个独裁者都是神秘论者，每个神秘论者都是潜在的独裁者。
道德观——你生命中的道德的唯一目的是去获得幸福，让自己得到快乐便是他的最高道德目标。“牺牲”就是为了你并不在乎的东西而放弃你所看重的。人的生命是道德的标准，在生命里，快乐是成功的状态，痛苦则通向死亡。正如你不能对大自然进行伪装一样，你同样也不能对人的品格进行假造。武力与头脑是截然对立的；枪声一响，道德无存。
价值观——人类是真正的英雄：以自己的幸福作为生活的道德准则，以实质性的成就作为最高贵的行动，以理性为自己唯一的主宰。人不应该为他人而活，也不应该要求他人为自己而活。思考是人的唯一最根本的美德，其它的一切皆因它而生。自豪就是承认你是自己的最高价值，这和一个人所有的价值一样，需要去赢得。
哲学观——A就是A，一个东西就是它本身。存在是特性，意识是鉴明。尘并裂存在是存在着的。每个问题都有两面，一面是正确，一面是错误，夹在对与错中间的则是邪恶。
2006年，好莱坞明星安吉妮亚·朱莉爆出希望出演即将拍摄的影片《阿特拉斯耸耸肩》（atlas shrugged），并自称是安·兰德（Ayn Rand，1905-1982）的粉丝，还希望男友布莱恩·匹特出演男主角，顿时吸引了不少眼球，也使得这部在半个世纪前出版的小说又一次回到了公众的视线之中，2007年，这条消息已经得到证实，影片《阿特拉斯耸耸肩》最后确定的男、女主角为布莱恩·匹特、安吉妮亚·朱莉。
对于所有发现了《源泉》，并且就进一步扩展它的思想向我提出许多问题的读者们，我想说，我是在这部小说中对这些问题做出回答，《源泉》只是《耸肩的阿特拉斯神》的序曲而已。
—— 安· 兰德
作者简介：
作者介绍
安•兰德（1905—1982），俄裔美国作家、哲学家。青年时代从苏联流亡美国，以其小说和哲学闻名于世。小说《源泉》（The Fountainhead）1943年出版后立即成为畅销书，并为她赢得了巨大的声誉，该书至今仍以每年超过10万册的数量再版。1957年《耸肩的阿特拉斯》（Atlas Shrugged）出版，成为美国历史上仅次于《圣经》的超级畅销书，被誉为对美国影响最大的10本书之一，累计销售超过8000万册。
安•兰德推崇理性，认为人的最高美德便是理性；她不顾传统舆论的偏见，力倡个人主义，认为不能使个人利益得到最大伸张的社会，就不是理想社会。她的客观主义哲学自20世纪50年代起风靡美国校园，影响了几代美国人，她本人也成为美国青年崇拜的偶像。安•兰德一生著述百余种，根据她的生平拍摄的记录片和故事片曾获奥斯卡奖。1982年安•兰德去世后，美国创立了许多兰德书友会和专门研究安•兰德思想的机构。
电子游戏用于教育的好处
电子游戏用于教育的好处
电子游戏用于教育的好处，随着生活水平的提高，越来越多的人是喜欢玩游戏的，而且一玩就是通宵的，对身体十分的不好，我和大家搭春一起来看看电子游戏用于教育的好处的相关资料，一起来看看吧。
电子游戏用于教育的好处1
1、感同身受的桥梁
英美文学课程所教的经典小说大都是普通人不愿意自己翻开的，所以要教授这些作品的内容，最重要的就是要让孩子们对他们所学的内容感同身受。其实许多其他课程也都是同样道理。我们就拿刚才说的《红字》来举例吧，这是一部关于身份和社会认同的硬书，所以要让学生感同身受的话，就需要类比现实生活，比如电影《绯闻计划》（Easy A）就是在类似的主题上进行的演绎。学生们通过这部电影，对小说所表达的内容有了更直观的认识。所以我们完全可以更进一步，用电子游戏作为感同身受的桥梁。
当我教《贝奥武夫》的时候，就可以列举《上古卷轴5：天际》里的许多梗。比如《天际》里的高吼峰（High Hrothgar）的名字就和《贝奥武夫》史诗中那位哀伤、孤独的国王同名。我们还可以讨论这个角色的形象是如何影响到Greybeard家园，以及小说和游戏中相同含义的贵族称号。有太多游戏作品都和文学作品有深远的渊源，例如Andrzej Sapkowski的《巫师》系列小说改编成的《巫师》系列游戏，还有Ayn Rand的《源泉》（The Fountainhead）与《生化奇兵》之间的联系。
2、探索历史
有些游戏会尽可能准确地还原一段历史时期，而让学生深入了解那段历史背景，也同样能帮助他们获得鲜活的学习经历。已有研究证明，通过自主的探索发现获得知识，远比被动灌输的`学习更有效。有的学校已经开始为学生提供VR体验，想象一下更进一步以后的样子。
比如《刺客信条：起源》的探索模式，玩家将探访古埃及的各处名胜，还有《泰坦尼克号：荣耀》，全都对历史进行了尽可能精准的还原，甚至包括泰坦尼克号航行当晚的星象都准确无误。还有游戏《瓦尔登湖》，让玩家亲自扮演超验主义代表人物Henry David Thoreau当年那一段经历，正是这知早耐段经历，给他带来了创作的灵感。另外还有《全面战争》系列和《天国：拯救》，游戏中的许多细节都精心地诉说着历史，让老师和学生都受益匪浅。
3、分析电子游戏
英美文学分析的对象主要是小说，但现在也有专门分析电影、电视甚至漫画的专业课，每一种媒体介质都自己独特的语言。例如一个电影镜头的视角能够带给观众怎样的感觉、如何让一个叙事者说的话令人可信、画面中的构图和符号学意义等等。类似的分析也可以扩展到电子游戏领域。市面上已经有太多剧情向作品，例如《艾迪芬奇的记忆》和《回家》等等。另外以玩家选择为核心的游戏也大有讲究，例如《奇异人生》和我自己最喜欢的《质量效应》。玩家扮演的主角面临不同的选择，而每一次选择都伴随角色的成长，也会揭示角色动机的探索，这种教学方式将让学生生前所未有地投入其中。
4、应用方式有无尽的可能
我的专业仅限于英语语言文学和历史，但电子游戏无疑能在其他领域发挥同样的作用，甚至有些游戏可以用来辅助医学院学生的实习。已经有越来越多的游戏被开发成教学资源，《Class Craft》就是一个用来创造个性化课堂的工具，Edutopia公司也提供许多资源和方案，将游戏化机制引入日常教学，尤其适用于一些经常被忽视的教育领域，例如社交与情感学习和培养创造力。
虽然电子游戏并不能代替传统的学习方式，但我相信游戏将逐渐成为一种重要的教学资源。我有许多同行都非常乐意在课堂中尝试引入电子游戏。作为老师，每当我发现学生们没兴趣，我自己也会失去兴趣。即使我对当堂的授课内容充满热情，也会清楚地知道学生们一个字都听不进去。教师的任务就是与其他干扰因素一起争抢学生的注意力，这场抢夺永无止境而且绝非易事，但所有老师都知道，只要能教好学生就应该无所不用其极。
每个睁昌老师都在尽力让自己的课程更加吸引人，更加令人难以忘记，虽然教学和教育并不能靠游戏来拯救，但我认为游戏值得在学校教育中获得更广泛的应用。
电子游戏用于教育的好处2
电子游戏的好处
其实如果好好控制别让自己沉迷游戏，优点还是有的！
1、 放松心情在游戏当中会暂时忘掉身边所烦恼，因为此时你的注意力已投入在游戏里头。
2、 减轻压力在游戏当中某些情景与角色是可以取代现实社会中所无法履行的，从中满足自己在现实社会所不能做的。
3、训练反应游戏中难免需要快速反应，长久以来灵敏度相对就提升，而且根据《外科手术成就报》报导，玩电子游戏的人会比其他人行动更快捷。
4、 增进感情
可以和亲朋好友一起度过休闲时光，增加共同话题。
5、开拓交友圈在游戏当中认识形形色色的人，经营好人际关系可以认识到多领域的朋友。
电子游戏若控制得恰当，那就是一件好事； 但若控制得不恰当，那就是一件伤害自己也影响他人的事了。因此，要懂得控制玩电子游戏，而不是让电子游戏控制我们。
《TheFountainhead》epub下载在线阅读，求百度网盘云资源
《The Fountainhead》（Ayn Rand）电子书网盘下载免费在线阅读
资源链接：
链接：
提取码：ytca
书名：The Fountainhead
作者：Ayn Rand
豆瓣评分：9.1
出版社：Signet
出版年份：1996-9-1
页数：720
内容简介：
建筑学专业的洛克先生从大学开始就因为不遵循传统说教而被开掉，而听话的另一位先生顺利的毕业并且找到一份好差事。所有人都不喜欢洛克先生，甚至专栏作家也时不时的老羞辱他，洛克爱着的姑娘——也不出所料的跟了那位听话的好好搏哗枯先生……洛克先生活着就是麻烦不断。 在一次政府建筑项目中，那位他的同学，听话的好好先生居然同意了洛克先生独立自主的设计。如果洛克先生能因此获得荣誉，获得成功，并获得尊敬，由此改变世界对他的看法，那真是美好的生活啊。可洛克先生并为因此获得好运气：公众一如既往芦腊的反对混子洛克设计建设的这个项目，政府也因此推翻了这个项目，而两位设计者也无法控告政府，政府是无权被告的。洛克先生又一基洞次显示了他混子本色，他搞了一些炸药把那做了一半的楼给炸成一堆碎瓦片子。他也因此而上了法庭，对于自己的行为，他是这么说的：创造是自己的私事，是天赋的权利，维护创造也是同样的天赋个人的权力……
Howard Roark is an architect whose genius and integrity will not be comprised. He has ideas that work against conventional standards.
作者简介：
安·兰德（1905-1982），俄裔美国作家、哲学家。青年时代从苏联流亡美国，以其小说和哲学闻名于世。小说《源泉》1943年出版后立即成为畅销书，并为她赢得了巨大的声誉，该书至今仍以每年超过10万册的数量再版。1957年《耸肩的阿特拉斯神》出版，成为美国历史上仅次于《圣经》的超级畅销书，被誉为对美国影响最大的10本之一，累计销售超过8000万册。
安·兰德崇理性，认为人的最高美德便是理性；她不顾传统舆论的偏见，力倡个人主义，认为不能使个人利益得到最大伸张的社会，就不是理想社会。她的客观主义哲学处20世纪50年代起风靡美国校园，影响了几代美国人，她本人也成为美国青年崇拜的偶像。安·兰德一生著述百余种，根据她的生平拍摄的记录片和故事片曾获奥斯卡奖。1982年安·兰德去世后，美国创立了许多兰德书友会和专门研究安·兰德思想的机构。
拜托了，急啊！勇敢的心 英文观后感
Hills, bagpipes, mist, the word “Scotland”腔则 written along the bottom of the screen – it can only be one place. That’s right, Wales. Nah, only joking – as if anyone would ever make a film about Wales.
Mel Gibson both directed and starred in this tartan-clad epic about William Wallace, the legendary Scottish freedom fighter/terrorist who, even way back in the 14th Century, had already had enough of the English going on about winning the World Cup in 1966. So, armed with just some rocks, a few hundred muck-dwellers and an extremely peculiar accent, he led a nation to fight for freedom from English tyranny. Or something along those lines.
It’s actually fairly appropriate to be so vague about all of this, because nobody really knows all that much about the real Wallace (and most of what we do know comes from a poem). You could spend a lifetime picking apart the historical inaccuracies in the flick, and there would still be those who’d disagree with what you found.
Because of that, how much enjoyment you can get from this 177-minute beast depends largely on your willingness to accept Wallace as a charmer with biting wit and a permanently clean-shaven chin. As the sort of bloke beautiful French princesses would hand over national secrets to simply because of the way he looks at them. Or even just as a guy who doesn’t smell like moss.
The most breath-taking, if gruesome, parts of the movie are the incredibly lifelike battle scenes. Putting them together must have been an immense project to undertake, but you’ve got to hand it to Gibbers – he does it very, very well. He also makes a likable hero figure, providing you can put to the back of your mind the fact that he’坦圆如让启s basically playing the original ned.
Personally I find the movie far too long, particularly as parts of it play like a TV advert for the Scottish Tourist Board. In one scene, for example, Wallace sprints to the top of a mountain and just stands there, kilt billowing, for no apparent reason. Anyone who’s ever worn a kilt will of course know that the last place you’re likely to linger is a-top a windy Scottish mountain. Talk about “freedom”!!
2
Long before The Passion of the Christ, Mel Gibson directed another cinematic masterpiece, Braveheart. Filmed against the backdrop of majestic mountains and rolling meadows, it tells the historically-based (yet not entirely accurate) story of William Wallace, a common man’s warrior who led the Scottish people in rebellion against King Edward I, also known as “Longshanks”. Written by Randall Wallace, an American tourist fascinated with a Scottish statue of his namesake, the script collected dust in Hollywood for over a decade before Gibson made the brilliant decision to put it on the big screen. Just like The Passion, it’s a decision he would not regret.
Set in the 11th Century, Braveheart catalogues the struggle of Scottish serfs who labor under the brutal oppression of English occupation forces. Amidst these terrible conditions, William Wallace (Mel Gibson) falls in love with Murron MacClannough (Catherine McCormack). Insistent on not sharing his wife (a proclamation by the king gives local rulers “first-night rights” to new brides) Wallace secretly marries Murron. Nevertheless, an English knight assaults her, sparking a fight with Wallace. Fleeing the village, Wallace believes Murron has escaped and will soon meet him at a secret rendezvous point. But Murron is captured and executed by the king’s emissaries.
Angered by his wife’s murder, Wallace instigates a local rebellion, slaughtering all the king’s loyalists in his village. As his rebellion grows, a distraught Longshanks (Patrick McGoohan) dispatches his fabled Northern Army to destroy it. But the heroic Wallace delivers a stirring speech to rouse his men, while deploying an ingenious battlefield trick to defeat the king’s cavalry.
With the power and legend of Wallace growing day by day, Longshanks relies on his daughter-in-law, Princess Isabelle (Sophie Marceau) to broker a truce. But Isabelle’s power is limited, and Wallace realizes his people can only win freedom if backed by the Scottish nobles. Their appointed leader is Robert the Bruce (Angus MacFadyen) who vacillates between his own idealistic views and his father’s pessimistic pragmatism. Will the nobles join with Wallace? Will the Scots win their freedom? Only history tells us the answer.
With elaborate costumes, vivid battle scenes, and a noble hero as its focal point, Braveheart is more than your typical run-of-the-mill action movie. Part history, part Hollywood heroism - its timeless idealism strikes a cord with every viewer. In fact, the movie itself led to a revival in nationalistic pride that fueled the successful Scottish independence movement of the 1990s. It’s a testament to the strength and character of the real life William Wallace. A thousand years later, his enduring legacy continues to transform the European landscape, and Mel Gibson captures the noble warrior’s passion with an awe-inspiring Academy Award-winning masterpiece.
3
BRAVEHEART is set in Scotland in the 1200s. It tells the true story of William Wallace who was a famous commoner who led his people in a rebellion against the English. The movie is of epic proportions, length and grandeur. We learn the entire history of William Wallace from the age of 8 until his death.
Mel Gibson, in what I found to be his best role ever, plays the grown up Wallace. Gibson directs the movie as well. The story is full of fascinating history of which I knew little. I have a good English history background but was surprised at what little early Scottish history I knew. Wallace wants to live in peace and ignore the English atrocities he has witnessed, but circumstances force his hand, and he declares war on the English. His battle cry is freedom and many poor people follow him in his quest. The story itself is quite compelling, and the script is excellent.
The political intrigue among the Scottish nobles makes you wonder whose side they are on. As the story unfolds, you come to realize that they are only interested in enriching themselves and do not care about their own people. They constantly counsel Wallace to compromise his ideas in order to achieve some lesser, but more practical solution. His vision is a singular one of freedom for his people. I found myself thinking of Gary Cooper in THE FOUNTAINHEAD and the similarity between his role and that of Gibson's. All of the leaders who were the "wisest" urged constant compromise on their rising young stars in both movies.
Actually, the movie most like BRAVEHEART is GETTYSBURG for both had huge and realistic battle scenes with wave after wave of humans charging each other and dying. Of course, many people will compare BRAVEHEART with ROB ROY. They are both about old Scottish heroes, and in my book, BRAVEHEART wins hands down. Finally, you may find yourself thinking of the Judas story from the Bible except here the movie has a plethora of Judases.
One example of the quality of the script is that the writer manages to introduce a very funny character without it seeming like merely a plot device, which of course it is. This character is a mad Irishman who steals every scene he is in with his dialog. I laughed out loud many times. Although there was little humor in this serious tale, there was just enough to keep me from ever tiring even though I had to stay seated for three hours.
Too often period pieces seem like merely exercises in style. I found QUEEN MARGOT to be one such movie. Here the wonderful costumes and set decoration feel totally authentic but in a natural way. I felt like I was actually in the thirteenth century where people's faces were frequently dirty and in general personal hygiene was minimal. When they made their kills in battle or in revenge, I could sense how close they were to animals then. The blood would splat on their faces, and they could just as easy have been wolves.
I have been to Scotland many times and it is gorgeous. In a low key but quite impressive way, the cinematography makes one feel the beauty and the isolation of countryside. The music with the recurring and haunting melody of the lone Scottish bagpipe sets a sad and yet serene tone and mood.
BRAVEHEART runs a long, but well worth it, 2:52. I would not want it shorten. It is rated R, but NC-17 would be more appropriate. It is THE goriest movie I have ever seen and that too I would not change because it allows one to vicariously live through what actual battles in that period would be like. Please be warned that you will see almost every part of the human body being chopped off or stabbed in one scene or another. Imagine any physical horror, and there is probably a scene of it in BRAVEHEART. Nevertheless, there was not one scene where I thought the violence was gratuitous. I would let older teenagers see the movie, but would be careful with impressionable younger ones.
4
When pagan Saxons invaded Britain pushing the native Celtic tribes back in the mountains of the west and the north of the country they couldn't have known what difficulties they leave to future generations. One of the difficulties were Scots, though they weren't much affected by the pagan invasion.
Throughout the history, Scots (as a tribe from Ireland was in 360 mentioned by Romans) had a changing luck in battles, whoever they fought. They had had many various allies and fought against many various enemies, including their former or future allies (politics).
Originally based in Ireland, the Scottish tribe later established their kingdom on the west coast and isles of today's Scotland (between years 501 and 503). Generally, they were never good friends with tribes which lived on the isle, called Britannia by the Romans, before them; perhaps because they came from Ivernia, today's Ireland...
The intolerance between the two sides resulted in many battles and rebellions. In 600, 300 Edinburgh horseman were killed by the English, in 1014 king Malcom II defeated the Danes, four years later another victory was won on the river Tweed, at Carham, against the army of Anglo-Saxons (particularly Northumbrians). On the other hand, king Duncan was defeated by the English and killed by famous character of the Scottish history, MacBeth, who is defeated in 1057 by Malcolm Canmore in the battle of Lumphanan etcetera etcetera.
Then, in the year of approximately 1272, William Walace is born in Ellerslie. He is fated to become one of the most important characters of the history of Scots. In age of twenty-five years, he kills sheriff (originally shire-reeve) of Lanark and a revolt is unleashed. Perhaps many Scots were waiting for a leader to emerge, because the same year Wallace defeats the English at Stirling Bridge.
His luck changed when he was defeated at Falkirk in 1298. In 1305, he is betrayed and executed brutally, his head being mounted on London Bridge.
That is a very rough outline of a life so very important, of the life of William Wallace, a thorough Scot, exactly the William Wallace about whom this movie is. His father was killed by the English, his wife was murdered by the sheriff of Lanark (which is a reason why the sheriff ended up equally) - no mercy could have been awaited from a man that had never seen mercy on the side of his enemies.
Braveheart is a heroic epic told compactly and relatively objectively, noticing everything important that most probably happened in the life of William Wallace. After all, it doesn't have to be historically exact - it is a legend and even if it was "only" a legend, it would be a most impressive one.
5
Back in 1995 when I first saw this movie I was wowed, it was a cinematic epic and one which I thoroughly enjoyed.... a few years later when I met my future spouse I was subjected to this movie on a weekly basis and now I cannot bare to watch it.
Anyway back to the movie, if you have been living under a rock and haven't seen it here's the basic story Mel Gibson plays William Wallace a Scottish highlander who leads his people in a uprising against the English monarch.
Now just so you know this film however "based" on historical events is completely inaccurate, Wallace was in actual fact a Scottish Noble (his family was rich), Wallace never had a wife, and the French princess Mel gets jiggy with would've been around 8 years old at the time, the only real truth in the movie was that he was hung drawn and quartered and he lead an uprising...the rest is Hollywood bullsh*t.
I'm giving the film 4 stars because if you are unaware of the historical inaccuracies and you haven't seen it 100 times you will be entertained, its a good movie.
《源泉》epub下载在线阅读，求百度网盘云资源
《源泉》（(美)安·兰德）电子书网盘下载免费在线阅读
链接：
提取码：1234
书名：源泉
作者：(美)安·兰德
译者：高晓晴
豆瓣评分：9.1
出版社：重庆出版社
出版年份：2013-6-1
页数：924
内容简介：
《源泉》的主人公洛克是一个诚实而坚强的建筑师，他志在启蒙社会，却在大学毕业前夕被学校开除，他的设计风格被社会视为异端，一度沦落到去采石厂当小工。他深爱的女人也处处和他作对，并与他的夙敌结了婚。最后，他答应无偿为政府设计经济实用房，但他的设计被政府主管部门任意修改，万般无奈之下，他抗起炸药包就把建到一半的楼炸回了砖头瓦砾。在法庭上，他也同样孤军奋战，为自己作为天才的原创行为（911份子大概还没出生呢）自辩：晌肆“创造是各己私事，是天赋权利，维护创造也是同等天赋个人的权利。”那个时候著作权、知识产权等概念还未曾为人们所认同。结果罗克被认定为“狂人”，并因此而无罪释放。
作者简介：
安·兰德（1905—1982），俄裔美国作家、哲学家。青年时代从苏联流亡美国，以其小说和哲学闻名于世。小说《源泉》（The Fountainhead）1943年出版后立即成为畅销书，并为她赢得了巨大的声誉，至今仍以每年超过10万册的数量再版宴唯轿。1957年《阿特拉斯耸耸肩》（Atlas Shrugged）出版，成为美国历史上仅次于《圣经》的超级畅销书，被誉为对美国影响最大的10本书之一，全球累计销售近亿册。
安·兰德推崇理性，认为人的最高美德便是理性；她不顾传统舆论的偏见，力山察倡个人主义，认为不能使个人利益得到最大伸张的社会，就不是理想社会。她的客观主义哲学自20世纪50年代起风靡美国，影响了几代美国人，她本人也成为美国青年崇拜的偶像。
安·兰德一生著述百余种，根据她的生平拍摄的纪录片和故事片曾获奥斯卡奖。1982年安·兰德去世，此后美国创立了许多兰德书友会和专门研究安·兰德思想的机构。
关于thefountainhead电影和thefounder电影的介绍到此就结束了，不知道你从中找到你需要的信息了吗 ？如果你还想了解更多这方面的信息，记得收藏关注本站。